One of the key differentiators for a company amongst its competitors has been the unique proprietary knowledge it possesses. But with the advent of the current Information Age, where information is freely available on the Internet, the word ‘proprietary’ is slowly losing its importance and meaning. This does not mean that the firms operating in specialized or niche verticals should shut shop. Availability of information is one thing and the ability to make sense out of it (knowledge) and use it to your advantage is the key paradigm that I want to talk about in this post.
A company armed with the right knowledge makes it more qualified in understanding a particular region and the operating dynamics can create strategies resulting in huge advantages over competitors who might lack the same familiarity. In the course of my work at Netscribes, I have come to appreciate the huge emphasis that companies place on the availability of ‘right information at the right time’. The advances in technology have opened up new possibilities in which information can be shared rapidly and efficiently. And along with it have come the various techniques, tools and methods to manage that information.
There are two ways in which a company can address its information needs. The first is by creating internal information repositories, which contain the “knowledge†aggregated through employee interactions internally and externally. Many organizations have started using tools and technologies like blogs, wikis, intranets or the more recent Microsoft Sharepoint in a conscious endeavor to make information sharing a habit. The basic premise being that a wealth of information about customers, competitors, products, research et al., can be collected and shared through daily transactions that an employee comes across. The second way is by creating special teams with the sole job of mining information available in the public domain. This is primarily seen as a competitive intelligence, opportunity scoping and market analytics activity.
Information management is not the crucial part. Creation and exchange of information are the more important activities in the knowledge space. It is interesting to note how such a methodology is perceived in the professional social environment, where people who do not know one another come together to work on a common goal of creation and exchange of information. What needs to be studied is how a company goes about creating internal knowledge markets when the product is something as intangible as valuable knowledge created from experience and individual thought process. Information is only the raw material – it is how that information is used to build the knowledge that forms the basis of strategic decision making.
I have added Google Analytics to my blog site. It takes nearly 12 hours before you can see data related to your site. I am waiting for the reports for my blog to come out, and will be posting them here soon.
Google Analytics is a free page tag-based measurement service based on Google’s Urchin acquisition in March of this year. The service is offering unlimited page views to AdWords customers and a cap of 5 million page views monthly for everyone else.
Whenever I update my blog, I used to do only technorati pings. Until I came across Pingoat - an excellent pinging service, which notifies a number of services that keep track of weblogs and publish them. Pinging these services lets them know that I have updated my blog, and that they can crawl and index my site. Pingoat is a very young online app that came online in July 2005. And I am loving it.
Google has launched an online feedreader, complete with labels and filters. Google seems to have a simple paradigm in the present competitive environment - come up with one product innovation and introduction every two weeks. Check out the new Google Reader.
Some of the interesting features worth looking at are ‘GmailThis’ and ‘BlogThis’ tools. The new feature is yet to be explored, but I am moving my opml files in the meanwhile.
Check out the new open source .NET CMS solution called Umbraco. I have been using another .NET CMS software called Community Server, but the features of Umbraco definitely stand out compared to CS. A very clean interface, unlimited user options and wonderful editing styles make this wonderful platform worth checking out.
Umbraco scores big time over Community Server, as it can assign various options and tasks that can be visible to one user or another. This is one of the key features that is lacking in CS.
Will be posting more on my experience with the software.
Google has launched Blog Search. The service is getting good reviews, and comparisons are being drawn about the relevance of results with Technorati et al.
The Blog Search tool also supports new search operators such as:
- inblogtitle:
- inposttitle:
- inpostauthor:
- blogurl:
Further, the results are available as Atom and RSS feeds. This new Google Blog Search tool is definitely going to make the blog and search space hotter.
I came across this article by Jeffrey Veen on the Movable Type website. He writes that content management projects fail not because of technology but because organizations don’t accommodate the human factors that make a project successful. Here is an interesting excerpt:
I’ve spoken to a number of Web teams that have used a CMS with varying levels of success. One problem I heard repeatedly was that the project worked fine, but nobody used the software once it was available. I call this the Stupid User Argument, and it’s a favorite of IT departments. The techies did their jobs, after all: They diligently gathered requirements, scoped out the solution, carefully selected a vendor, and managed the project to a mostly on-time and on-budget conclusion.
So how come nobody actually uses these systems once they’re in place? The answer is easy: People don’t like to change the way they work, particularly knowledge workers.
Knowledge workers spend years building strategies to accomplish their jobs, practices that likely date back to study skills acquired during their education. So changing those processes — no matter how valid the provided technical solution — is nearly impossible. Users will rebel, even after substantial training.
To have any chance of success, a content management project must follow the same user-centered design practices as any other project. Task analysis, rapid prototyping, usability testing — all of these methods are crucial to a CMS rollout. It’s foolhardy to unveil a mammoth, nine-month project to an unsuspecting user community and expect adoption.
But there is a larger issue at play. Even the most thoughtful projects may be misguided. Over and over I’ve heard the same complaint about these projects, “Turns out, after all the budget and time we spent, we really didn’t need a content management system at all. We just needed some editors.
Recent Comments